Modeling the Satisfaction of Data Literacy Online Training for High School Teachers Using PLS SEM

Abstract View: 0, PDF Download: 0 SIMILARITY INDEX Download: 0

Authors

  • Marizsa Herlina Universitas Islam Bandung https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6304-4153
  • Nur Azizah Komara Rifai Universitas Islam Bandung
  • Dwi Agustin Nurani Sirodj Universitas Islam Bandung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32665/statkom.v4i1.4429

Keywords:

Learner Satisfaction, Online Teacher Training, PLS-SEM, Data Literacy Training

Abstract

Background: The gap between before and after the pandemic is incredibly noticeable, especially in education. It mainly changes how schools operate their teaching and learning activities from offline to online. Indonesia must also implement online learning. The basic needs for data literacy in administration are strongly needed, such as inputting data for students' attendance, scores, and many more. Teachers need to improve their data literacy skills to help them evaluate and design new content structures for online teaching to meet students' required satisfaction. Therefore, the teachers’ training program in data literacy always needs to be updated.

Objective: This study aims to determine the factors that influence teacher satisfaction in data literacy online training programs

Methods: This study employs partial least square structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) to analyze the factors influencing teacher satisfaction in online data literacy training programs for high school teachers.

Results: The results show that the instructor's guidance, support, module content, and experience positively influence learner satisfaction in online data literacy training. The PLS-SEM can explain 62.53% of learner satisfaction

Conclusion: Online training providers can consider these variables their primary focus when providing high-quality online training, especially in data literacy. The instructor guidance and support include instructor expertise, the assistance provided, and many more, and the module content and experience include a suitable syllabus for the learner and the ease of use of the learning system.

References

Baber, H. (2020). Determinants of students’ perceived learning outcome and satisfaction in online learning during the pandemic of COVID19. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 7(3), 285–292. https://doi.org/10.20448/JOURNAL.509.2020.73.285.292

Bickle, M., Rucker, R., & Burnsed, K. A. (2019). Online Learning: Examination of Attributes That Promote Student Satisfaction. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 22(1), 1–7. https://ojdla.com/archive/spring221/bickle_rucker_burnsed221.pdf

Chen, W. S., & Tat Yao, A. Y. (2016). An Empirical Evaluation of Critical Factors Influencing Learner Satisfaction in Blended Learning: A Pilot Study. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(7), 1667–1671. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040719

Fathurrohman. (2020). Kompetensi Guru pada Teknologi Masih Rendah. Fajar Indonesia. https://fin.co.id/2020/02/07/kompetensi-guru-pada- teknologi-masih-rendah/

Göltl, K., Ambros, R., Dolezal, D., & Motschnig, R. (2024). Pre-Service Teachers’ Perceptions of Their Digital Competencies and Ways to Acquire Those through Their Studies and Self-Organized Learning. Education Sciences, 14(9), 951. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14090951

Harahap, M., Pristiyono, P., Lubis, J., Ikhlash, M., & Anjar, A. (2021). Level of Satisfaction of Online Learning in Mediation Lecturer Competence on Learning Motivation. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal, 4(3), 3981–3990. https://www.bircu-journal.com/index.php/birci/article/view/2166

Henderson, J., & Corry, M. (2021). Data literacy training and use for educational professionals. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching and Learning, 14(2), 232–244. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-11-2019-0074

IMF. (2018). Chart of the Week: The Digital Divide in Asia. Blogs.Imf.Org. https://blogs.imf.org/2018/09/25/chart-of-the-week-the-digital-divide-in-asia-2/

Janah, M., & Kartini, A. Y. (2022). Penerapan Metode Regresi Linier Berganda Pada Kasus Balita Gizi Buruk Di Kabupaten Bojonegoro. Jurnal Statistika Dan Komputasi, 1(2), 74–82. https://doi.org/10.32665/statkom.v1i2.1170

Jaya, I. G. N. M., & Sumertajaya, I. M. (2008). Pemodelan Persamaan Structural dengan Partial Least Square. Semnas Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika 2008, 118–132.

Jogezai, N. A., & Baloch, F. A. (2023). Native, addict, innovator: young teachers’ digital competence in the post-COVID-19 instructional era. International Journal of Educational Management, 37(6–7), 1382–1400. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-03-2023-0148

Kaur, C., Tan, P. P., Nurjannah, N., & Yuniasih, R. (2025). Exploring data literacy self-perception among Indonesian high school students. PLoS ONE, 20(1 January), 4–6. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0312306

Li, N., Marsh, V., & Rienties, B. (2016). Modelling and Managing Learner Satisfaction: Use of Learner Feedback to Enhance Blended and Online Learning Experience. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 14(2), 216–242. https://doi.org/10.1111/dsji.12096

Mandinach, E. B., & Gummer, E. S. (2016). Every teacher should succeed with data literacy. Phi Delta Kappan, 97(8), 43–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721716647018

Pham, T., Lai, P., Nguyen, V., & Nguyen, H. (2021). Online learning amid Covid-19 pandemic: students’ experience and satisfaction. Journal Of E-Learning And Knowledge Society, 17(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1135293

Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2017). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. In Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation (pp. 1–34). Springer International Publishing AG 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05542-8_15-1

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2025-06-30

How to Cite

Herlina, M., Rifai, N. A. K., & Sirodj, D. A. N. (2025). Modeling the Satisfaction of Data Literacy Online Training for High School Teachers Using PLS SEM. Jurnal Statistika Dan Komputasi, 4(1), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.32665/statkom.v4i1.4429
Abstract View: 0, PDF Download: 0 SIMILARITY INDEX Download: 0