PEER REVIEW PROCESS

The review process in the Citius journal includes several stages including: The editor receives the script from the author; The editor evaluates the manuscript (the purpose and scope of the journal, in the style of the house, additional data); (Denied if it does not meet the criteria) Filtering editors for plagiarism in offline and online databases manually; (Denied if major plagiarism is found, contact the author if there is a small redundancy or plagiarism found for clarification) The editor sends the script to the reviewer along with the review form (double blind review, both the reviewer and the author remain anonymous with each other); The reviewer sends the review form back to the Editor (with a revised text if necessary); Editor's decision (rejected, requires major revisions, needs minor revisions, or is accepted); Confirm to the Author. If revised, the author revises the text and must be returned to the editor without delay. Returns of more than three months will be considered as new shipments.