Analysis of Generation Alpha Creative Thinking in Solving Math Word Problems Reviewed by Learning Styles

Abstract View: 4,
Download: 1

Authors

  • Sukma Ayu Universitas PGRI Semarang
  • FX Didik Purwosetiyono Universitas PGRI Semarang
  • Dewi Wulandari Universitas PGRI Semarang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32665/james.v9i1.6378

Keywords:

alpha generation, creative thinking, learning style, math word problem

Abstract

This study aims to investigate and analyze the creative thinking abilities of Generation Alpha junior high school students in solving systems of linear equations in two variables (SPLDV) word problems, viewed from their learning styles. The research employed a descriptive qualitative approach supported by NVivo software for automatic coding (autocode) and thematic visualization. The subjects consisted of 24 eighth-grade students from a school in Tegal regency, with results showing that 45.8% were visual learners, 29.1% auditory learners, and 25% kinesthetic learners. Furthermore, three students were purposively selected since it adequately represents the variety within the category to represent each learning style category for in-depth analysis. The instruments used included a learning style questionnaire, SPLDV word problem tests, and interview guidelines. Data were analyzed using the Miles and Huberman interactive model, while validity was ensured through methodological triangulation. The findings reveal that: (1) visual learners demonstrated all four indicators of creative thinking, with a notable strength in flexibility; (2) auditory learners achieved three indicators, particularly excelling in fluency; and (3) kinesthetic learners fulfilled four indicators, with a strong emphasis on elaboration. The prevalence of short-form visual content on social media influences Generation Alpha’s learning preferences, which are faster-paced and more visually oriented.

 

References

Aminah, A., & Ayu Kurniawati, K. R. (2018). Analisis kesulitan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita matematika topik pecahan ditinjau dari gender. JTAM (Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika), 2(2), 118–122. https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v2i2.713

Autida, N. (2024). The influence of learning styles on mathematical performance among junior high school students. Journal of Educational Issues, 10(2), 18–30. https://doi.org/10.5296/jei.v10i2.22029

Budi, S. S., Suhaili, N., & Irdamurni, I. (2021). Konsep gaya belajar dan implementasinya pada proses pembelajaran. Journal of Educational and Learning Studies, 4(2), 232–236. https://doi.org/10.32698/01992

DePorter, B., & Hernacki, M. (2015). Quantum learning: Membiasakan belajar nyaman dan menyenangkan. Kaifa.

Fadlurrohim, I., Husein, A., Yulia, L., Wibowo, H., & Raharjo, S. T. (2020). Memahami perkembangan anak generasi alfa di era industri 4.0. Focus: Jurnal Pekerjaan Sosial, 2(2), 178–186. https://doi.org/10.24198/focus.v2i2.26235

Fitri, D., & Nuh, M. (2025). Mathematical creative thinking process of MTs Islamic Boarding School Darul Ihsan students in solving social arithmetic problems. Prima: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(1), 210–228. https://doi.org/10.31000/prima.v9i1.13109

Hariri, D. D., Mahmudah, H., Wibawa, F. S., & Kania, N. (2025). Unraveling the connection: A systematic review of learning styles and mathematics achievement. Pedagogical Research, 10(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/15681

Huliatunisa, Y., Wibisana, E., & Hariyani, L. (2019). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal pemecahan masalah. Indonesian Journal of Elementary Education, 1(1), 56–65.

Ismunandar, D., Gunadi, F., Taufan, M., Mulyana, D., & Runisah. (2020). Creative thinking skill of students through realistic mathematics education approach. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1657(1), Article 012054. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1657/1/012054

McCrindle. (2021). The ABC of XYZ: Understanding the global generations. Hachette Australia.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2018). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE.

Musaidah, E., Purnomo, D., & Setyowati, R. D. (2020). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kreatif ditinjau dari gaya belajar siswa. Imajiner: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 2(5), 383–393.

Nadzifah, N., Purwosetiyono, F. D., Nursyahidah, F., & Susilawati, P. (2024). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal word problem materi matriks ditinjau dari literasi siswa. JagoMIPA: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan IPA, 4(2), 206–218. https://doi.org/10.53299/jagomipa.v4i2.483

Najib, M., Hasyim, W., & Anam, S. (2026). Validitas dan reliabilitas dalam penelitian kualitatif. Pediaqu, 13(1), 104–116.

Nasution, N. (2024). The development period of Generation Alpha: Viewed from the perspective of developmental psychology. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, Psikologi dan Kesehatan (J-P3K), 5(1), 158–164. https://doi.org/10.51849/j-p3k.v5i1.302

Nizaruddin, Waluyo, S. B., Rochmad, & Isnarto. (2020). Validitas dan reliabilitas angket gaya belajar VAK. [Nama jurnal tidak dicantumkan], 2, 435–441.

Nugraha, K. S., Zaenuri, Z., & Suyitno, A. (2023). Kemampuan berpikir kreatif pada model pembelajaran SAVI bernuansa etnomatematika berdasarkan gaya belajar. JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika), 7(2), 210–224. https://doi.org/10.33603/jnpm.v7i2.8128

Partono, P., Wardhani, H. N., Setyowati, N. I., Tsalitsa, A., & Putri, S. N. (2021). Strategi meningkatkan kompetensi 4C (critical thinking, creativity, communication, & collaborative). Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Pendidikan, 14(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpipfip.v14i1.35810

Purwosetiyono, D., Sa’dijah, C., & Hidayanto, E. (2018). Prospective teachers conception of mathematical creative thinking. International Journal of Insight for Mathematics Teaching, 1(2), 106–114.

Sánchez-Ruiz, L. M., Llobregat-Gómez, N., & Rodrigo-Ilarri, J. (2024). The Alpha Generation and its learning style: Insight within a Central Asia micro training courses project. Proceedings of the LACCEI International Multi-Conference for Engineering, Education and Technology, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.18687/LACCEI2024.1.1.2045

Sari, A., & Wulandari, D. (2022). Profil kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa dalam pemecahan masalah matematika ditinjau dari gaya kognitif. Aksioma: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 13(2), 293–300. https://doi.org/10.26877/djehy3rr

Sholihah, N., & Aini, A. N. (2023). Kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa dengan gaya belajar visual, auditorial, dan kinestetik dalam menyelesaikan soal HOTS. Focus ACTion of Research Mathematic, 6(1), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.30762/factor

Sigus, H., & Mädamürk, K. (2025). Students’ motivation as a mediator between extra-mathematical knowledge and word problem-solving. Discover Education, 4(1), Article 95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00595-3

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Suripah, S., & Sthephani, A. (2017). Kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis mahasiswa dalam menyelesaikan akar pangkat persamaan kompleks berdasarkan tingkat kemampuan akademik. Pythagoras: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(2), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v12i2.16509

Wahyuddin, W., & Ihsan, M. (2016). Analisis kemampuan menyelesaikan soal cerita matematika ditinjau dari kemampuan verbal pada siswa kelas VII SMP Muhammadiyah se-Kota Makassar. Suska Journal of Mathematics Education, 2(2), 111–118. https://doi.org/10.24014/sjme.v2i2.2213

Wijayanto, M. T., Purwosetiyono, F. D., & Prasetyowati, D. (2021). Kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa dalam menyelesaikan word problem ditinjau dari gaya belajar siswa. Jurnal Silogisme: Kajian Ilmu Matematika dan Pembelajarannya, 6(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.24269/silogisme.v6i1.3081

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30
Abstract View: 4, PDF Download: 1