Analysis of Generation Alpha Creative Thinking in Solving Math Word Problems Reviewed by Learning Styles
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32665/james.v9i1.6378Keywords:
alpha generation, creative thinking, learning style, math word problemAbstract
This study aims to investigate and analyze the creative thinking abilities of Generation Alpha junior high school students in solving systems of linear equations in two variables (SPLDV) word problems, viewed from their learning styles. The research employed a descriptive qualitative approach supported by NVivo software for automatic coding (autocode) and thematic visualization. The subjects consisted of 24 eighth-grade students from a school in Tegal regency, with results showing that 45.8% were visual learners, 29.1% auditory learners, and 25% kinesthetic learners. Furthermore, three students were purposively selected since it adequately represents the variety within the category to represent each learning style category for in-depth analysis. The instruments used included a learning style questionnaire, SPLDV word problem tests, and interview guidelines. Data were analyzed using the Miles and Huberman interactive model, while validity was ensured through methodological triangulation. The findings reveal that: (1) visual learners demonstrated all four indicators of creative thinking, with a notable strength in flexibility; (2) auditory learners achieved three indicators, particularly excelling in fluency; and (3) kinesthetic learners fulfilled four indicators, with a strong emphasis on elaboration. The prevalence of short-form visual content on social media influences Generation Alpha’s learning preferences, which are faster-paced and more visually oriented.
References
Aminah, A., & Ayu Kurniawati, K. R. (2018). Analisis kesulitan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita matematika topik pecahan ditinjau dari gender. JTAM (Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika), 2(2), 118–122. https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v2i2.713
Autida, N. (2024). The influence of learning styles on mathematical performance among junior high school students. Journal of Educational Issues, 10(2), 18–30. https://doi.org/10.5296/jei.v10i2.22029
Budi, S. S., Suhaili, N., & Irdamurni, I. (2021). Konsep gaya belajar dan implementasinya pada proses pembelajaran. Journal of Educational and Learning Studies, 4(2), 232–236. https://doi.org/10.32698/01992
DePorter, B., & Hernacki, M. (2015). Quantum learning: Membiasakan belajar nyaman dan menyenangkan. Kaifa.
Fadlurrohim, I., Husein, A., Yulia, L., Wibowo, H., & Raharjo, S. T. (2020). Memahami perkembangan anak generasi alfa di era industri 4.0. Focus: Jurnal Pekerjaan Sosial, 2(2), 178–186. https://doi.org/10.24198/focus.v2i2.26235
Fitri, D., & Nuh, M. (2025). Mathematical creative thinking process of MTs Islamic Boarding School Darul Ihsan students in solving social arithmetic problems. Prima: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(1), 210–228. https://doi.org/10.31000/prima.v9i1.13109
Hariri, D. D., Mahmudah, H., Wibawa, F. S., & Kania, N. (2025). Unraveling the connection: A systematic review of learning styles and mathematics achievement. Pedagogical Research, 10(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/15681
Huliatunisa, Y., Wibisana, E., & Hariyani, L. (2019). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal pemecahan masalah. Indonesian Journal of Elementary Education, 1(1), 56–65.
Ismunandar, D., Gunadi, F., Taufan, M., Mulyana, D., & Runisah. (2020). Creative thinking skill of students through realistic mathematics education approach. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1657(1), Article 012054. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1657/1/012054
McCrindle. (2021). The ABC of XYZ: Understanding the global generations. Hachette Australia.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2018). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE.
Musaidah, E., Purnomo, D., & Setyowati, R. D. (2020). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kreatif ditinjau dari gaya belajar siswa. Imajiner: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 2(5), 383–393.
Nadzifah, N., Purwosetiyono, F. D., Nursyahidah, F., & Susilawati, P. (2024). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal word problem materi matriks ditinjau dari literasi siswa. JagoMIPA: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan IPA, 4(2), 206–218. https://doi.org/10.53299/jagomipa.v4i2.483
Najib, M., Hasyim, W., & Anam, S. (2026). Validitas dan reliabilitas dalam penelitian kualitatif. Pediaqu, 13(1), 104–116.
Nasution, N. (2024). The development period of Generation Alpha: Viewed from the perspective of developmental psychology. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, Psikologi dan Kesehatan (J-P3K), 5(1), 158–164. https://doi.org/10.51849/j-p3k.v5i1.302
Nizaruddin, Waluyo, S. B., Rochmad, & Isnarto. (2020). Validitas dan reliabilitas angket gaya belajar VAK. [Nama jurnal tidak dicantumkan], 2, 435–441.
Nugraha, K. S., Zaenuri, Z., & Suyitno, A. (2023). Kemampuan berpikir kreatif pada model pembelajaran SAVI bernuansa etnomatematika berdasarkan gaya belajar. JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika), 7(2), 210–224. https://doi.org/10.33603/jnpm.v7i2.8128
Partono, P., Wardhani, H. N., Setyowati, N. I., Tsalitsa, A., & Putri, S. N. (2021). Strategi meningkatkan kompetensi 4C (critical thinking, creativity, communication, & collaborative). Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Pendidikan, 14(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpipfip.v14i1.35810
Purwosetiyono, D., Sa’dijah, C., & Hidayanto, E. (2018). Prospective teachers conception of mathematical creative thinking. International Journal of Insight for Mathematics Teaching, 1(2), 106–114.
Sánchez-Ruiz, L. M., Llobregat-Gómez, N., & Rodrigo-Ilarri, J. (2024). The Alpha Generation and its learning style: Insight within a Central Asia micro training courses project. Proceedings of the LACCEI International Multi-Conference for Engineering, Education and Technology, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.18687/LACCEI2024.1.1.2045
Sari, A., & Wulandari, D. (2022). Profil kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa dalam pemecahan masalah matematika ditinjau dari gaya kognitif. Aksioma: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 13(2), 293–300. https://doi.org/10.26877/djehy3rr
Sholihah, N., & Aini, A. N. (2023). Kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa dengan gaya belajar visual, auditorial, dan kinestetik dalam menyelesaikan soal HOTS. Focus ACTion of Research Mathematic, 6(1), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.30762/factor
Sigus, H., & Mädamürk, K. (2025). Students’ motivation as a mediator between extra-mathematical knowledge and word problem-solving. Discover Education, 4(1), Article 95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00595-3
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Suripah, S., & Sthephani, A. (2017). Kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis mahasiswa dalam menyelesaikan akar pangkat persamaan kompleks berdasarkan tingkat kemampuan akademik. Pythagoras: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(2), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v12i2.16509
Wahyuddin, W., & Ihsan, M. (2016). Analisis kemampuan menyelesaikan soal cerita matematika ditinjau dari kemampuan verbal pada siswa kelas VII SMP Muhammadiyah se-Kota Makassar. Suska Journal of Mathematics Education, 2(2), 111–118. https://doi.org/10.24014/sjme.v2i2.2213
Wijayanto, M. T., Purwosetiyono, F. D., & Prasetyowati, D. (2021). Kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa dalam menyelesaikan word problem ditinjau dari gaya belajar siswa. Jurnal Silogisme: Kajian Ilmu Matematika dan Pembelajarannya, 6(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.24269/silogisme.v6i1.3081
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Mathematics Education and Science

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work
PDF Download: 1












