Optimizing Student Performance Assessment and Ranking Using the SAW–TOPSIS Approach

Abstract View: 12,
Download: 10

Authors

  • Lintang Nur Wahyundaru Universitas Islam Negeri Syekh Wasil Kediri
  • Nur Fadillatul Ilmiyah Universitas Islam Negeri Syekh Wasil Kediri
  • Nalsa Cintya Resti Universitas Islam Negeri Syekh Wasil Kediri

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32665/james.v9i2.5538

Keywords:

SAW Method, Student Performance Assessment, Student Ranking, TOPSIS Method

Abstract

Student assessment is a fundamental aspect of education for comprehensively measuring learning progress. Given that conventional assessment systems, which focus solely on academic grades, often neglect other important aspects of student performance, a more objective and holistic approach is necessary. This study aims to explain the implementation of a combined method of SAW and TOPSIS to optimize student performance assessment and ranking. This research uses a descriptive quantitative approach with data collection techniques through interviews and documentation. The results show that the combination of the SAW and TOPSIS methods can provide an objective ranking of students based on the predetermined criteria: academic scores, extracurricular scores, academic or non-academic achievement scores, attendance scores, violation scores, and madrasah scores. From the calculation results, the student with the highest rank is S06 with a preference value of 0,622009183, while the student with the lowest rank is S19 with a preference value of 0,137883342. This ranking provides a clearer picture of each student's performance, which can be used as a basis for evaluation and decision-making by the school.

References

Angraini, R. D., Arianto, J., & Hariyanti, H. (2023). Penanaman Nilai Karakter Kedisiplinan Melalui Kegiatan Ekstrakurikuler Di Sekolah. Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, 20(1), 63. https://doi.org/10.24114/jk.v20i1.43810

Basri, B. (2017). Metode Weightd Product (Wp) Dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerimaan Beasiswa Prestasi. Jurnal Insypro (Information System And Processing), 2(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.24252/insypro.v2i1.2474

Behzadian, M., Otaghsara, S. K., Yazdani, M., & Ignatius, J. (2012). A State-Of The-Art Survey Of Topsis Applications. Expert Systems With Applications, 39(17), 13051-13069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.056

Blasco-Blasco, O., Liern-García, M., López-García, A., & Parada-Rico, S. E. (2021). An Academic Performance Indicator Using Flexible Multi-Criteria Methods. Mathematics, 9(19), 2396. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9192396

Boumi, S., & Vela, A. (2022). Impacts Of Students Academic Performance Trajectories On Final Academic Success. arXiv preprint. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2201.08744

Chahnia, J., Remiswal, Khadijah, & Suzianti, L. (2024). Penggunaan Performance Assessment Sebagai Instrumen Penilaian Pada Mata Pelajaran Al-Quran Hadist Kelas Viii Di Mts-S Thawalib Padang. Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, 8(2), 1395–1402. https://journal.upy.ac.id/index.php/pkn/article/view/6538/4080

Ciardiello, F., & Genovese, A. (2023). A Comparison Between Topsis And Saw Methods. Annals Of Operations Research, 325(2), 967–994. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-023-05339-w

Damanik, R. (2017). Sistem Pengambilan Keputusan Penerimaan Beasiswa Bidik Misi Menggunakan Metode Analytic Hierarchy Process ( Ahp ). Jurnal Teknik Informatika Unika St. Thomas (Jtiust), 2(2), 78–84. https://doi.org/10.17605/jti.v2i2.195

Fahrudin, A. & Warnars, H. L. H. S. (2020). Prediksi Performa Siswa Dengan Metode Saw (Simple Additive Weighting). Kilat, 9(1), 92–102. https://doi.org/10.33322/kilat.v9i1.872

Gunawan, R. D., Ariany, F., & Novriyadi, N. (2023). Implementasi Metode Saw Dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Plano Kertas. Journal Of Artificial Intelligence And Technology Information, 1(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.58602/jaiti.v1i1.23

Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Methods For Multiple Attribute Decision Making. In Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods And Applications A State-Of-The-Art Survey (Pp. 58-191). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9_3

Ilmiyah, N. F., Hasani, S. Z. N. A., & Renaningtyas, D. (2023). Combination Of Saw-Topsis And Borda Count Methods In Sequencing Potential Convalescent Plasma Donors. Barekeng: Jurnal Ilmu Matematika Dan Terapan, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.30598/barekengvol17iss3pp1521-1532

James, N., Loganathan, S., Nathan, R. J., Victor, V., & Ng, P. K. (2023). Integrated Fuzzy Ahp And Topsis As Innovative Student Selection Methodology. Human Systems Management, 42(2), 179–191. https://doi.org/10.3233/hsm-220046

Krishnan, A. R., Hamid, M. R., Tanakinjal, G. H., Asli, M. F., Boniface, B., & Ghazali, M. F. (2023). An Investigation To Offer Conclusive Recommendations On Suitable Benefit/Cost Criteria-Based Normalization Methods For Topsis. Methodsx, 10, 102227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2023.102227

Lamrini, L., Abounaima, M. C., & Talibi Alaoui, M. (2023). New Distributed-Topsis Approach For Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Problems In A Big Data Context. Journal Of Big Data, 10(1), 97. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-023-00788-3

Liu, Y., Wang, J., & Shi, B. (2026). Comparing Topsis And Vikor To Prioritize International Communication Interventions Across Digital Platforms. Scientific Reports, 16(1), 14958. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-45798-2

Marbun, E., & Hansun, S. (2019). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Program Studi Dengan Metode Saw Dan Ahp. Ilkom Jurnal Ilmiah, 11(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.33096/ilkom.v11i3.432.175-183

Muqorobin, M., Apriliyani, A., & Kusrini, K. (2019). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerimaan Beasiswa Dengan Metode Saw. Respati, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.35842/jtir.v14i1.274

Pertiwi, W., Nurahman, N., & Aziz, A. (2022). Decision Support System Untuk Menentukan Lokasi Cabang Baru Muhri Fashion Menggunakan Penggabungan Topsis Dan Saw. Jurnal Sistem Komputer Dan Informatika (Json), 3(3), 241.https://doi.org/10.30865/json.v3i3.3874

Saputra, A. A., & Santi, R. C. N. (2022). Pemilihan Tempat Usaha Kuliner Di Wilayah Semarang Barat Dengan Metode Saw Dan Topsis Berbasis Web. Jurnal Tekno Kompak, 16(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.33365/jtk.v16i2.1562

Sharma, V., Bangri, N. A., & Iskandar, A. (2024). Decision Support System For Selection Of Outstanding Students Using Topsis. Ceddi Journal Of Education, 3(1), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.56134/cje.v3i1.92

Sholihat, A., & Gustian, D. (2021). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Siswa Berprestasi Dengan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (Saw) (Studi Kasus: Smk Dwi Warna Sukabumi). Prosiding Seminar Nasional Sistem Informasi Dan Manajemen Informatika Universitas Nusa Putra, 1, 140–147. https://sismatik.nusaputra.ac.id/index.php/sismatik/id/article/view/20

Somya, R., & Wardoyo, R. (2019). Perancangan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Asisten Dosen Menggunakan Kombinasi Metode Profile Matching Dan Topsis Berbasis Web Service. Khazanah Informatika : Jurnal Ilmu Komputer Dan Informatika, 5(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.23917/khif.v5i1.7924

Sukamto, S., Fitriansyah, A., & Pratama, R. P. (2020). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Matakuliah Pilihan Menggunakan Metode Topsis (Studi Kasus: Prodi S1 Sistem Informasi Fmipa Universitas Riau). Digital Zone: Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi, 11(1), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.31849/digitalzone.v11i1.3511

Wang, T.-C., Nguyen, T. T. T., & Phan, B. N. (2022). Analyzing Higher Education Performance By Entropy–Topsis Method. Measurement, 55(5–6). https://doi.org/10.1177/00202940221089504

Downloads

Published

2026-07-30
Abstract View: 12, PDF Download: 10